New Westminster resident Graham Taylor-Smith looks out from his home over the train
yard where he says Southern Railway's trains are causing excessive noise for residents - 27 May 2011.
12 August 2011
New Westminster Quay Residents Hope Court Case Will Quiet Trains
New Westminster British Columbia - New Westminster Quay residents are just now getting back to the reality of loud trains rolling past
their condo towers throughout the night, following the repair of the Queensborough rail bridge.
But they hope an upcoming court case will limit the noise rail yards can emit at night.
A Federal Court of Appeal case in September will decide how much power the Canadian Transportation Agency has to enforce federal noise and vibration
restrictions against rail companies. The court's decision could strengthen the agency's mandate, potentially giving Quayside residents the peace they're
For Quayside resident Allan Morris, the banging of trains in the city's central rail yard and nearby rail lines has caused six years of disrupted nights.
"It feels like that train is going over the end of my bed," said Morris, who owns a condo in a high rise on Quayside Drive.
He said as many as four trains "clack, click, and bang," past his building at all hours of the night.
Quayside is half urban living and half heavy industry, squeezed onto a strip of Fraser River-front land about one kilometre long and approximately four city
blocks deep, Morris explained.
The Quayside Community Board tried to find a solution to the industrial racket by negotiating an agreement in December 2008 with Canadian National, Canadian
Pacific, and BNSF Railway in Vancouver, said James Crosty, the board's current president.
The parties agreed to a set of guidelines to ease the strain on residents without disrupting rail yard business, but the problems continued, he said.
"We embarked on a process to get some peace and quiet," Crosty said. "It failed."
Crosty said the Quayside board asked the Agency to intervene after the companies wouldn't honour the "confidential" mediated settlement, but the rail
companies fired back by challenging the Agency's jurisdiction.
The rail companies argued that the matter was closed and outside of the purview of the agency because of the mediation agreement.
"The agency is taking the position that it has jurisdiction to adjudicate," said agency spokeswoman, Jacqueline Bannister. Without providing details,
Bannister said the agency hopes its jurisdiction isn't limited on 20 Sep 2011, when the Federal Court decides if the agency can force the rail companies to
change their operations' practises, despite the existence of mediated agreements.
In addition to the Federal Court case, help for the residents may come from a local MP who has been battling train noise for more than six years.
"Every Canadian should have the right to get a good night's sleep," said Burnaby-New Westminster MP Peter Julian, who has been advocating on behalf
of Quayside residents in the dispute over late-night rail noise.
For his part, Julian proposed a private member's bill during the last Parliament to toughen the Canada Transportation Act, enforced by the agency, by
specifically prohibiting idling, shunting, and coupling of cars on weekends and overnight between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m.
He said the bill died before passing because of the federal election in May, but he plans on proposing it again when Parliament resumes.
Julian said he doesn't have much confidence in the agency's mediation process and he'll push to change the legislation no matter what happens in court.
There are dozens of communities in Canada with the same noise problem, he said.
If the rail companies win in Federal Court "that means that the current legislation is completely useless for communities struggling to reduce unnecessary
noise," Julian said.
The lawyer for the rail companies, Richard DeFilippi, said he couldn't comment on the matter while it is before the courts.
Spokesmen for Canadian Pacific, Canadian National, and BNSF Railway also declined to comment because of the coming court date.
For Allan Morris, the best case scenario would be "eight hours of uninterrupted sleep."