Photo
A CP SD40-2 with the earlier multimark paint scheme leads a current CP locomotive and one from Kansas City Southern - Date? Brandon Muir.
TRAINS
Link fails continuously
News Wire No. 1 Story of 2021 CP and CN Battle for KCS
31 December 2021

North America - The Battle for Kansas City Southern (KCS), culminating in Canadian Pacific's (CP) triumph over Canadian National (CN), is Trains' top railroading story of the year.
 
(Editor's note: This may have seemed like a foregone conclusion, but balloting was close, with this story receiving just one more first-place vote and nine more points than the No. 2 story.)
 
Stage Was Set with 2020 Approach by Investor Groups
 
The seeds for the CP/KCS merger were planted in the summer of 2020, when a private investor consortium sought to take the company private.
 
News reports that Blackstone Group and Global Infrastructure Partners wanted to acquire KCS for US$21 billion prompted CP CEO Keith Creel to call KCS CEO Pat Ottensmeyer in August 2020 to propose a merger of equals.
 
Such a deal, Creel said, would face the least amount of regulatory uncertainty because it was an end-to-end merger that would unite the two smallest Class I railroads.
 
KCS considered dueling merger offers from CP and an investor group identified only as "Party A" right up until March 2021.
 
On 20 Mar 2021, KCS accepted CP's US$29 billion offer and their deal for the first merger of Class I railroads in two decades was unveiled the next day.
 
But CN was waiting in the wings.
 
It submitted an unsolicited US$33.6 billion offer for KCS on 20 Apr 2021.
 
On 21 May 2021 KCS terminated its merger agreement with CP and accepted CN's offer.
 
"Overall, we are the better bid, the better partner, the better railway, the best solution for KCS, and for the North American economy," CN CEO JJ Ruest said.
 
Why all the interest in KCS?
 
The 6,700 mile railroad's north-south main line stretches from Kansas City deep into Mexico.
 
Its cross-border traffic has doubled since 2012 and shows no signs of slowing down as intermodal, automotive, and refined products traffic all continue to grow.
 
The pandemic has laid bare an over-reliance on manufacturing in Asia, and railroaders expect some of that production to shift to low-cost Mexico as part of a phenomenon known as near-shoring.
 
Toss in the updated NAFTA agreement called USMCA, and you have the potential for more growth by creating the first railroad to link Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.
 
Thus the CP and CN battle to acquire KCS.
 
Regulatory Chess Match
 
In what would prove to be a pivotal move, CP and KCS sought to have their combination reviewed under the Surface Transportation Board's (STB) less onerous old merger rules.
 
The STB in April approved the request under a waiver that had been granted to KCS when the board tightened its merger review rules in 2001.
 
The STB on 6 May 2021 approved CP's request to place KCS in a voting trust while the merger is under review.
 
CN sought to gain merger approval under the board's untested and far tougher "new" review rules.
 
And it asked the board for permission to put KCS into a voting trust, a structure that allows shareholders to receive their cash and shares in the new company at the start of the merger review process.
 
Creel said there was no reason to sweeten his railroad's bid for KCS because CN's offer was so anti-competitive that it would never make it out of the starting gate.
 
CP's deal with KCS was ironclad, Creel insisted, and CN's was so fraught with regulatory risk that it was "unattainable," a "fantasy," and "fool's gold."
 
As CP and CN traded barbs over their merger proposals and rounded up support from shippers, KCS scheduled a 19 Aug 2021 meeting where shareholders would vote on the CN merger deal.
 
Ahead of the shareholder vote, CP boosted its offer to US$31 billion so that KCS investors would have an alternative to consider.
 
But KCS postponed the meeting to await an STB decision on CN's request to put KCS into a voting trust.
 
Then came the bombshell.
 
The STB on 31 Aug 2021 rejected the CN/KCS voting trust, saying it was not in the public interest.
 
Absent the voting trust, it would be nearly impossible for CN to acquire KCS.
 
KCS accepted CP's offer on 15 Sep 2021, ending the five-month contest.
 
CP and KCS went on to file their merger application on 29 Oct 2021.
 
The massive filing with the STB outlines Canadian Pacific Kansas City's (CPKC) growth projections, including a near tripling of traffic on CP's former Milwaukee Road lines leading to Kansas City and on the KCS main from Kansas City to the Laredo, Texas, gateway.
 
The STB is expected to rule on the merger by late 2022.
 
Fallout for CN
 
TCI Fund Management, the London-based firm that holds US$4 billion worth of CN shares and is the railway's second-largest investor, in May urged CN to drop its bid for KCS, citing the regulatory risk.
 
TCI also said it would ask for the resignation of Ruest and CN Chairman Robert Pace if the railway's KCS bid failed.
 
After the 31 Aug 2021 STB ruling, TCI ripped CN's management in a presentation posted to its website, and in a scathing letter to the railway's board.
 
CN had lost operational discipline, TCI claimed, and needed to renew its focus on running a lean, reliable, and efficient railroad.
 
TCI asked for a special shareholder meeting where investors could consider its proposed slate of four directors.
 
And the fund proposed that CN hire its former chief operating officer, Jim Vena, to replace Ruest.
 
CN responded in September with a plan to cut costs, reduce capital spending, and raise revenue to reduce the railway's operating ratio to 57 percent in 2022.
 
And as CN announced earnings in October, Ruest announced he would retire in January.
 
CN expects to name a successor in January.
 
Bill Stephens.

 Image Meanwhile... Jim Vena opted not to work for CN.
*1. Appropriate news article image inserted.
(there was no image with original article)
*2. Original news article image replaced.
(usually because it's been seen before)
News quoted by OKthePK website under
provisions in Section 29 of the Canadian
Copyright Modernization Act.